Token Voting
DAO Governance Models Compared: Token Voting, Optimism's Bicameral Model, and Security Councils
There is no universally optimal DAO governance model. The right architecture depends on protocol stage, community size, treasury scale, and security requirements. But there are clearly wrong models — and the governance attacks, voter apathy crises, and plutocracy complaints of 2022-2025 have clarified what failure looks like. This comparison maps the full governance architecture landscape.
On-Chain Governance: Models, Outcomes and the Participation Problem
The promise of on-chain governance — that stakeholders in a protocol can collectively determine its direction through transparent, verifiable, and …
Token Voting: Definition and How On-Chain Governance Works
Definition
Token voting is the dominant governance mechanism used by decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs). In its basic form, holders of a designated …
The Problems With Token-Weighted Voting: Plutocracy, Apathy, and How DAOs Are Fixing Governance
Token-weighted voting is the default governance mechanism for DAOs controlling billions of dollars in treasury assets. Its problems — plutocracy, chronic voter apathy, governance attacks, and delegate cartel formation — are well-documented and poorly solved. This analysis surveys the data on what is broken and the mechanisms being deployed to fix it.
On-Chain Governance: Token Voting, Multisig, and DAO Governance Mechanisms
On-Chain Governance: Token Voting, Multisig, and DAO Governance Mechanisms
The governance stack for decentralised autonomous organisations has undergone rapid …